In contrast to dead-end filtration, cross-flow filtration demands meticulous process optimization. This includes strategies for improving production efficiency, optimizing TMP migration and process control, boosting recovery rates, and refining cleaning processes. This article offers insights into process development strategies and optimization parameters.
1. Tailoring Cross-flow Velocity for Optimal Results
Selecting the appropriate cross-flow velocity is a critical aspect of ultrafiltration process development. This decision hinges on the product’s ability to withstand shear forces. Generally, a recommended cross-flow velocity of approximately 5 LMM (L/min/m2) serves as a baseline. Adjustments can be made based on product characteristics, with higher velocities (6-7 LMM) for shear-tolerant products and lower velocities (2-4 LMM) for those less tolerant.
2. Fine-tuning TMP and Production Parameters
Once the cross-flow velocity is established, the focus shifts to optimizing Transmembrane Pressure (TMP). This parameter significantly influences filtration efficiency and membrane flux recovery. Through meticulous adjustment of the backflow valve and evaluating permeate volume under different TMP conditions, an optimal pressure range (e.g., 0.65 to 0.75 bar) is identified. Repeated TMP optimization for different batches ensures consistency and minimizes production deviations.
3. Real-time Production Process Control
Continuous monitoring of cross-flow velocity and TMP during production is vital. As ultrafiltration progresses, material concentration increases, leading to a gradual TMP rise. Real-time pressure monitoring, strategic backflow valve adjustments, and, if necessary, controlled pump speed reduction for highly concentrated proteins help maintain stability. Post-filtration, a controlled pump speed reduction aids in material recovery, followed by a thorough rinse or flush to maximize product recovery.
4. Systematic Cleaning for Batch Integrity
System cleaning post-ultrafiltration is crucial for batch integrity, membrane pack preservation, and lifespan. A cleaning flow rate 1-1.5 times that of ultrafiltration, adjusted to 5-7 LMM if necessary, enhances efficiency. The choice of cleaning agent, such as NaOH, is critical, and alternatives like nitric acid, phosphoric acid, citric acid, and Tween surfactants can be considered. Cleaning effectiveness, measured by comparing water flux post-filtration with initial values, usually exceeds 90%.
5. Prudent Storage Practices
Often overlooked, proper storage of consumables, specifically membrane packs, is essential. Membrane packs should be stored in a humid environment to prevent membrane material fragility in dry conditions, ensuring sustained filtration capacity. Various storage methods are outlined for reference.
In conclusion, this article provides a foundational understanding of ultrafiltration process optimization. As a comprehensive technology, ultrafiltration demands development based on the Quality by Design (QBD) concept, considering scalability, quality stability, operability, and cost control. Cobetter offers comprehensive process product supply and technical support, collaborating with customers to enhance biopharmaceutical processes.
NEO SMART’s technical team, backed by a wealth of application cases and scale-up data, is standing ready to provide comprehensive technical solutions, aiding pharmaceutical companies in formulating rational selection strategies. Explore the world of COBETTER for a transformative journey in ultrafiltration excellence.
Contact us for any query about Cobetter Filters in UAE,
Neo Smart Laboratory Equipment Trading L.L.C
Office No. 1508, Mai Towers, Al Nahda-I
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
+ 971 585 950 777
#cobetter #ultrafiltration #pharmaceutical